Chapter 22
Toward Freedom: Struggles for Independence
- Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison for treason, sabotage, and conspiracy
- decolonization was important in the second half of the 20th century
- newly independent states experimented politically, economically, and culturally
- faced challenges:
- divisions of language, ethnicity, race, class
- rapidly growing populations
- working toward stability and economic modernization
- influence of industrialized nations
- European colonial empires not as permanent as they seemed in the early 1900s
- the 1940s: India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel won independence
- the 1950s-1970s: African Independence
- imperial breakup; novelty was a mobilization of masses around nationalist ideology and creation of new nation-states
- comparison to the first decolonization of the late 18th and early 19th centuries
- in the Americas, most colonized people of European origin
- common culture with common rulers
- fall of many empires in the 20th century
- after WWI: Austrian and the Ottoman empires
- Russian Empire collapsed but was then recreated as USSR
- African and Asian independence movements shared with "end of empire" stories ideal of national self-determination
- non-territorial empires (the U.S. held powerful influence) under attack
- 1991: the disintegration of USSR was propelled by national self-determination
- created 15 new states
- 1900: few people predicted the imperial collapse
- explanations for decolonization
- the fundamental contradiction in the colonial enterprise
- historians use the idea of "conjuncture" to explain timing of decolonization
- changes in social values encouraged Africans and Asians seeking independence
- independence contested everywhere
- efforts usually not cohesive movements of uniformly oppressed people
- fragile coalitions of conflicting groups and parties
- freedom movements varied in length of time to achieve independence, use of violence, and ideological affiliation
- before 1900, few people of India subcontinent thought of themselves as Indians
- cultural identity was primarily local
- big diversity
- British rule promoted a growing sense of Indian identity
- unlike before, the British didn't assimilate
- British communications and administrative networks, schools, and use of English bound India together
- 1885: Indian National Congress (INC)
- almost exclusively an association of English-educated, high-caste Hindus
- moderate demands; asked for a greater role in British India
- British mocked and rejected them
- INC gained a wide following after WWI
- role of Mohandas Gandhi (1869-1948)
- studied law in England
- 1893, found a job in South Africa
- he developed political philosophy of satyagraha (true force)
- became a leader of INC in India
- attacked colonial rule and mistreatment of India's untouchables and evils of modernization
- Gandhi embraces efforts to mobilize women
- asserting spiritual and mental equality
- without breaking older conceptions of gender roles
- not all agreed with Gandhi
- Jawaharlal Nehru embraced science, technology, and the industry as future
- others rejected nonviolence
- growing divisions between Hindus and Muslims
- 1906: All India Muslim League
- some Hindu politicians defined nationalist struggle in religious terms
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah, head of Muslim League, argued region with Muslim majority should be separate states (Pakistan, land of pure)
- 1947: independence created 2 countries
- Pakistan (Muslim, divided into 2 wings - 1,000 miles part)
- India (mostly Hindu)
- the process came with mass violence; one million dies, 12 million refugees relocated
- 1948: Hindu extremist assassinated Gandhi
- 1990: South Africa won freedom from Great Britain
- the government was controlled by white settler minority
- white population split between British descendants (economic superiority) and Afrikaners (Boers) Dutch descent (political dominance)
- 1899-1902: Afrikaners failed to win independence from the British in the Boer War
- both white groups felt threatened by the black minority rule
- the early 1900s: South Africa had a mature industrial economy
- the 1960s: major foreign investments and loans
- black South Africans extremely dependent on the white-controlled economy
- race issue overwhelmingly prominent
- reflected in apartheid laws separating races
- 1912: African National Congress (ANC) founded
- like INC, consisting of elite Africans wanting a voice in society
- 40 years, ANC was peaceful and moderate
- women denied full membership until 1943 but protested and boycotted
- the 1950s: moved to nonviolent civil disobedience
- governments response was overwhelming repression
- underground nationalist leaders turned to sabotage and assassination
- opposition focused on student groups
- 1976: Soweto uprising was the start of spreading violence
- organization of strikes
- growing international pressure
- exclusion from international sporting events
- economic boycotts
- withdrawal of private investment funds
- the 1980s: began negotiations
- key apartheid policies abandoned
- Mandela freed and ANC was legalized
- 1994: national elections brought ANC to power
- apartheid ended without major bloodshed
- the most important threat was the number of separatists and "Africans only" groups
- new nations emerging from colonial rule confronted the problem of how to parlay independence into economic growth, unification, and political participation
- independent, but not industrialized countries faces quest for a better life
- 1950-2000: developing nations contained 70% world's population
- independence created euphoria, optimism faded
- conditions confronted efforts to establish political order:
- explosive population growth
- high expectations for independence
- cultural diversity, with little loyalty to a central state
- variety of government types were communist, one-party states, and democracies
- the 1950s: European authorities set up democratic institutions in African colonies
- India: Western-style democracy succeeded
- independence movement more extended, power handed over
- more Indians than Africans had administrative and technical skills at a time of independence
- Indian Congress Party embodied nationalist movement without internal discord
- elsewhere democracy was more fragile
- the early 1970s: few still survived
- many defeated via military coups
- some evolved into one-party systems or personal dictatorships
- various arguments why Africans initially rejected democracy
- Africans not ready for democracy or lacked some necessary element
- African traditional culture - communal based on consensus, not compatible with party politics
- Western-style democracy inadequate to the task of development
- widespread economic disappointment discredited early democracies
- African economic performance was poor since independence
- economic hardship
- modern government staked popularity on economic success
- well-educated elite benefited most obtaining high paying bureaucratic jobs caused resentment
- economic resentment found expression in ethnic conflict
- the military took power in crisis
- Latin America experienced military coups
- military forces had a long history of intervention
- demographic, economic, and social tensions challenged the privileges of rich and power
- left-wing insurrections encountered by military coups backed by elites and the United States
- 1970: Chile elected Marxist leader, fell to a military coup
- the 1980s: Western-style democracy resurfaced
- Spain, Portugal, and Greece
- the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
- extensive-expression in developing countries of Global South
- recently in Arab countries
- poverty isn't inevitable
- colonial rule hadn't provided much infrastructure for modern development
- developing countries didn't have leverage negotiating with wealthy nations and corporations
- contradictory advice on developing successfully
- expectations in developing word that the state would spur economic growth
- private economies weakly developed
- Chinese and Soviet industrialization provided models
- growing dependence on market forces for economic development over several decades
- urban vs rural development
- women's access to employment, education, and birth control provided incentives to limit family size
- degree of economic development varied
- eastern Asia has been the most successful
- the 1990s: India opened itself to the world market
- Brazil was 8th largest economy in the world
- Turkey and Indonesia - top 20
- no general agreement why such great variations developed
- Western-style modernity and tradition has been an issue across the developing world
- Islam: Turkey and Iran approached the issue of how Islam and modernity relate to each other differently
- Turkey: emerged after WWI, led by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881-1938)
- the 1920s and 1930s: major cultural revolution
- efforts for modern, western society
- Islamic underpinning of society abolished or under firm government control
- men: not allowed to wear fez; elite women gave up the veil
- women: gained legal rights, polygamy abolished, vote
- the 1970s: Iran became center of Islamic revival
- growing opposition to Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi's modernizing, secularizing, the U.S. supported the government
- Shah's reforms offended traditional Islamic practices
- the mosque became the main canter of opposition to the government
- 1979: Shah forced to abdicate, Khomeini assumed control
- a cultural revolution based on Islamization of public life
- Sharia law replaced Secular law
- women required to wear hijab, segregation in public life, restrictive marriage laws
- women found greater educational opportunities, retained the right to vote
- Iran wanted to spread the revolutionary spirit
- the revolution continues, opposition among some
- the country continues to pursue economic modernity
Comments
Post a Comment